COMPARE ENGAGEMENTS

Choose the right work.

Compare the purpose, the practical inputs, and what each engagement leaves with your team.

Continuous validation follows change across important controls. AI application security focuses on the data and actions an AI workflow can reach.

ENGAGEMENT

Continuous validation

When it fits: Important controls need rechecking as systems and releases change.
The work: Targeted security testing that follows change, validates important controls, and turns findings into decisions.
What you supply: The relevant systems, release changes, test boundaries, and access agreed for each cycle.
What you receive: Actionable findings, clear priorities, and evidence that critical controls work as intended.
Timing or allocation: Cadence scoped to your release cycle

ENGAGEMENT

When it fits: An AI workflow can reach sensitive data, retrieved content, or connected tools.
The work: Adversarial testing of AI applications, from prompt injection and data exposure to unsafe tool use and broken guardrails.
What you supply: The AI workflow, user roles, data and tool boundaries, and agreed test access.
What you receive: A prioritized report with reproduction steps, evidence of the boundaries tested, and a retest of important fixes.
Timing or allocation: Typical engagement: 1–4 weeks

A conversation can help determine whether one focused project or an ongoing engagement fits.